Difference between revisions of "Bookmarks/BSD"
From Flavio's wiki
(add OpenBSD Packet Filter FAQ) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** [http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi OpenBSD Manual Pages] | ** [http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi OpenBSD Manual Pages] | ||
** [http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ OpenBSD Packet Filter FAQ] | ** [http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ OpenBSD Packet Filter FAQ] | ||
| + | *** [http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html Network Address Translation (NAT)] | ||
** [http://www.openbsd.org/4.0_packages/i386.html OpenBSD 4.0 packages/i386] | ** [http://www.openbsd.org/4.0_packages/i386.html OpenBSD 4.0 packages/i386] | ||
** [http://users.resentment.org/~unix/openbsd/pppoe.html Mini-Faq on PPPoE For OpenBSD] | ** [http://users.resentment.org/~unix/openbsd/pppoe.html Mini-Faq on PPPoE For OpenBSD] | ||
[[Category:Bookmarks]] | [[Category:Bookmarks]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:46, 30 October 2007
I happen to like Linux more than the BSD dialects, but they are just as good as alternatives to proprietary operating systems:
- FreeBSD is powering some of the busiest servers on the Net
(and Daemon is the best logo ever, especially the female versions) - NetBSD supports so many architectures that you can probably run it even on your microwave oven
- OpenBSD is as secure as an operating system can be - that is, for a computer that is actually turned on
(for those that don't get this: there's an old joke saying that a computer is secure only if it's unplugged from the network, turned off and buried in concrete)
